Honestly I expected a bigger difference after 14 years but that video is in really shit quality either way
video is too low res
Video quality is closer to the time where the first Incredibles was made smh
Little bit higher quality
Its the nuances that really hold their own. Theres so many more small movements and subtle gestures, those are what really make the difference, not just the render quality.
The character design is also a whole lot softer
Yeah, this isn't official footage since the quality for The Incredibles 2 is so damn low. It's not really doing this any justice.
But I saw the IMAX double feature and it was so cool that it picked off literally where the last one ended so you could really experience how different it looked. The first thing I noticed was how much better the hair was. We've come so far and it's so damn cool.
I remember that one of the featurettes on The Incredibles DVD mentioned that the hair animation they had for Violet was a breakthrough... And look at how much better it looks now!
The lighting's the biggest change IMO. 3D characters no longer default to a plastic/metal exterior, but have actual skin. Body animations look pretty similar overall, but faces are much more expressive today.
Incredibles was Pixar’s first film with human lead characters instead of supporting characters (Andy, Andy’s mum, Boo) or supporting antagonists (Sid, Al, the Dentist). They’ve since done eight films with either human lead characters or a greater emphasis on human supporting characters (Ratatouille, Wall-E, Up, Toy Story 3, Brave, Inside Out, The Good Dinosaur, Coco). IIRC Pixar took on Incredibles at that time as they wanted to push themselves to make a movie with human main characters and each of those films since helped them with developing their skills at animating humans. Compare Merida, Riley or Miguel with Andy in the first Toy Story.
Probably the best thing about Pixar making sequels is seeing how far their tech has come when they revisit old characters. I can’t wait to see how the Toy Story gang look in Toy Story 4 next year considering how much Pixar’s tech has advanced in the last 8 years.
The facial features and animation was great, compared to the first Incredibles. Lots of movement and emotion in their expressions. I'm sure working more with human characters over the years has helped with that. That was one of the big things I noticed after watching Incredibles 2.
Wow, now the bottom one looks like one of those "unfinished VFX" videos.
My thoughts exactly.
The biggest improvement is the hair technology.
I recently re-watched the first movie and the hair was almost distracting.
It was the first animated movie where they could do stuff like hair and water reasonably well, that's why they show it off.
Back in the day, there really proud about the kid's hair animation when he's running.
Yeah, I didn't mind the rest of the animation but the hair is so distracting when watching it.
Saw this last night. The top video is heavily washed out and nowhere near what the movie actually looked like. Those whites are as bright as the sun in this one.
Never heard that one before.
ICE of you to drop by!
Enough about you wife.
They went and gave Tony a whole damn makeover.
I would guess that's also big different in team size between the two movies. I would guess Incredible 2 team is 2-3 times bigger with better tools and better training with them than the first team enjoyed. We also don't know how much time was involved in doing each scene. Incredible 2 probably had more time overall to work on the scene.
I know it's a lot of speculation but i would not throw shade on incredible 1 just because some "magic technology" happened. It almost never technology, technology doesn't do better art, it allows you do to better art but it doesn't mean that most people would be able to.
I think it's both. They probably have a much bigger team, but animation technology has definitely improved in the last 10 years as well. 10 more years and I'm confident we'll be able to make completely realistic animation if we choose to.
Subsurface scatering is the biggest difference for me. It makes them look a lot softer and adds a glow to their skin.
The newer looks more "manga like". Cuter by enlarging the eyes and smoothing the skin.
Almost all the characters between the movies look exactly the same except for Tony.
So, bloom and depth of field?
It doesn't look worse but that's a credit to the first movie. So far ahead if it's time as far as animation is concerned. Every slight hair movement is animated perfectly.
Wow first one looks so much better, but I think it's more due to the art style.
News & Discussion about Major Motion Pictures